Menu Close

Federal judge blocks Florida social media censorship law

US Judge Robert Hinkle from the Northern District of Florida (Tallahassee Division) Wednesday granted a preliminary injunction against Florida’s new social media law FL SB 7072 which, among other things, mandated social media companies to publish detailed standards for censorship, shadow-banning, and de-platforming of users. It also required that these standards be applied consistently and that users be informed of changes to rules, terms and agreements before implementation of such changes.

The lawsuit was filed by social media trade associations NetChoice LLC and Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA). They argued that the Act violates the free-speech clause of the First Amendment “by interfering with the providers’ editorial judgment, compelling speech, and prohibiting speech.”

Judge Hinkle held that while social media platforms are not entirely indistinguishable from newspapers or other traditional mediums for First Amendment purposes, they still exercise editorial scrutiny and engage in speech, thus subjecting the Florida statute to First Amendment scrutiny.

The statute contains viewpoint and content-based restrictions to speech which are subject to strict scrutiny as per prior precedent like Reed v. Town of Gilbert, Ariz. To pass strict scrutiny, the infringement on speech must have a compelling state interest and must be “narrowly tailored” towards achieving such interest. Judge Hinkle noted that the state of Florida is unlikely to succeed in establishing the same, not only because the leveling of the playing field for the exchange of ideas among private players is not a legitimate governmental interest but also that the statute’s restrictions itself are akin to “burning the house to roast a pig”.

Thus, he held that the plaintiffs are likely to prevail on the merits of their claim and if they are not granted a preliminary injunction, will face irreparable injury to their First Amendment rights.

Both CCIA and NetChoice welcomed the court’s ruling, with Matt Schruers of CCIA claiming it as “a win for internet users and the First Amendment,” and Steve DelBianco of NetChoice saying it “protects private businesses against the State’s demand that social media carry user posts that are against their community standards.”

The ruling prevented SB 7072 from taking effect on July 1, 2021. If Florida’s Governor Ron DeSantis decides to appeal the ruling, this issue will proceed to the Eleventh Circuit.

Article: Federal judge blocks Florida social media censorship law

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

(UN General Assembly, 1948) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: 1. All human beings are free and equal 2. No discrimination 3. Right to life 4. No slavery 5. No torture and inhuman treatment 6. Same right to use law 7. Equal before the law 8. Right to be treated fair by court 9. No unfair detainment 10. Right to trial 11. Innocent until proved guilty 12. Right to privacy 13. Freedom to movement and residence 14. Right to asylum 15. Right to nationality 16. Rights to marry and have family 17. Right to own things 18. Freedom of thought and religion 19. Freedom of opinion and expression 20. Right to assemble 21. Right to democracy 22. Right to social security 23. Right to work 24. Right to rest and holiday 25. Right of social service 26. Right to education 27. Right of cultural and art 28. Freedom around the world 29. Subject to law 30. Human rights can’t be taken away